![](/wp-content/themes/Paper/images/icons/header-phone.png)
![](/wp-content/themes/Paper/images/icons/email.png)
Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma Case Study
In the presented case study, a 65-year-old woman has received a Stage 3 non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma diagnosis during her visit to her primary care physician’s office. After leaving the office, she attempts to review her test results through her Personal Health Record (PHR). However, she can only access a portion of her test results due to the diverse sources from which her tests were conducted – some outside the organization, some in the emergency room, and some within her doctor’s office.
Reflecting on this scenario, consider the following questions for discussion:
1. Pros and Cons of the Situation:
– Pros: The patient has the convenience of accessing her health information through a PHR, providing her a better understanding of her condition and test results. This empowers her to take charge of her healthcare decisions and share information with her family.
– Cons: Incomplete information due to data being scattered across different healthcare organizations could lead to confusion, misinterpretation, and potentially affect the continuity of care. The patient’s concerns about incomplete results and fragmented information could result in unnecessary anxiety.
2. Safeguards in Patient Portals and PHRs:
Patient portals and PHRs include several safeguards to ensure safety:
– Secure Login: Users need to authenticate themselves to access health information, protecting the data from unauthorized access.
– Encryption: Information is often encrypted during transmission to prevent interception.
– Access Control: Patients can control who has access to their health information.
– Audit Trails: Systems maintain logs of who accessed the information and when, enhancing accountability.
– Data Accuracy: Patients can review their records and report discrepancies, promoting accuracy.
3. Agree or Disagree with the Process:
Whether one agrees or disagrees with the process depends on the context. While PHRs offer patients more control over their health information, the challenge arises when data is distributed across various sources. Improving interoperability among different healthcare systems would help address this issue.
4. Challenges for Patients without Full EHR Access:
Patients without access to complete Electronic Health Records (EHRs) face several challenges:
– Incomplete Picture: They may lack a comprehensive view of their health history, affecting decision-making.
– Coordinated Care: Inadequate access can hinder effective coordination between different healthcare providers.
– Miscommunication: Fragmented information might lead to miscommunication and misunderstandings.
– Duplicate Tests: Without full access, patients might undergo redundant tests if previous results are not visible.
In conclusion, the scenario highlights the benefits and drawbacks of patients accessing health information through PHRs. While patient empowerment and information sharing are positive aspects, challenges like incomplete data and lack of interoperability need to be addressed to ensure seamless and effective healthcare.
Provide your requirements and let our native nursing writers deliver your assignments ASAP.
You cannot copy content of this page