Nursing Research Critique Essay Guidelines

Nursing Research Critique Essay Guidelines

In a nursing research critique essay spanning 1000-1250 words, we will summarize the study, discuss how its findings can be applied in nursing practice, and address ethical concerns linked to the study’s execution. Please refer to the “Nursing Research Critique Essay Guidelines” below for the suggested structure and content. Follow the APA Style Guide, available in the Student Success Center, for formatting. An abstract is not needed. This assignment is subject to a rubric, so review it before starting. Ensure you submit this assignment through Turnitin.

Nursing Research Critique Essay Guidelines

Nursing Research Critique Essay – Qualitative Study

Background of Study:

1. Identify the clinical problem and research problem that led to the study. What was not known about the clinical problem that, if understood, could be used to improve health care delivery or patient outcomes? This gap in knowledge is the research problem.

– Recognize the issue in clinical practice and the corresponding research problem. Highlight the unknown aspects that could enhance patient care.

2. How did the author establish the significance of the study? In other words, why should the reader care about this study? Look for statements about human suffering, costs of treatment, or the number of people affected by the clinical problem.

– Explain how the author conveyed the study’s importance, considering factors like human suffering, treatment costs, or the scale of the clinical issue.

3. Identify the purpose of the study. An author may clearly state the purpose of the study or may describe the purpose as the study goals, objectives, or aims.

– Determine the study’s purpose, which might be explicitly stated or described as goals, objectives, or aims.

4. List research questions that the study was designed to answer. If the author does not explicitly provide the questions, attempt to infer the questions from the answers.

– Compile the research questions guiding the study, even if not explicitly outlined by the author.

5. Were the purpose and research questions related to the problem?

– Assess the alignment between the study’s purpose and research questions with the identified problem.

25 Best Databases for Peer-Reviewed and Scholarly Journal Articles

Method of Study:

6. Were qualitative methods appropriate to answer the research questions?

– Evaluate if qualitative methods were suitable for addressing the research questions.

7. Did the author identify a specific perspective from which the study was developed? If so, what was it?

– Determine if the author specified a particular perspective informing the study.

8. Did the author cite quantitative and qualitative studies relevant to the focus of the study? What other types of literature did the author include? Are the references current?

– Analyze the author’s use of relevant literature, both quantitative and qualitative, and consider the currency of references.

9. Did the author evaluate or indicate the weaknesses of the available studies?

– Examine whether the author assessed the limitations of existing research.

10. Did the literature review include adequate information to build a logical argument?

– Evaluate if the literature review provided sufficient information to construct a logical argument.

11. When a researcher uses the grounded theory method of qualitative inquiry, the researcher may develop a framework or diagram as part of the findings of the study. Was a framework developed from the study findings?

– Determine if a framework emerged from the study’s findings when grounded theory was used.

Results of Study:

12. What were the study findings?

– Summarize the key findings of the study.

13. What are the implications to nursing? Explain how the findings contribute to nursing knowledge/science. Would this impact practice, education, administration, or all areas of nursing?

– Discuss how the findings influence nursing, contributing to knowledge, and potentially impacting various aspects of the field.

Ethical Considerations:

14. Was the study approved by an Institutional Review Board?

– Confirm whether the study received approval from an Institutional Review Board.

15. Was patient privacy protected? Were there ethical considerations regarding the treatment or lack of?

– Assess whether patient privacy was safeguarded and identify any ethical considerations related to treatment.

Conclusion:

16. Emphasize the importance and congruity of the thesis statement.

– Highlight the significance and alignment of the thesis statement.

17. Provide a logical wrap-up to bring the appraisal to completion and to leave a lasting impression and take-away points useful in nursing practice.

– Conclude logically, leaving a lasting impression and offering practical take-away points for nursing practice.

18. Incorporate a critical appraisal and a brief analysis of the utility and applicability of the findings to nursing practice.

– Critically appraise the study and briefly analyze how its findings can be applied in nursing practice.

19. Integrate a summary of the knowledge learned in the nursing research critique essay.

– Summarize the key insights gained from the nursing research critique essay.

Nursing Research Critique Essay – Quantitative Study

Background of Study:

20. Identify the clinical problem and research problem that led to the study. What was not known about the clinical problem that, if understood, could be used to improve health care delivery or patient outcomes? This gap in knowledge is the research problem.

– Recognize the clinical problem and corresponding research problem, highlighting areas where understanding could enhance healthcare or patient outcomes.

21. How did the author establish the significance of the study? In other words, why should the reader care about this study? Look for statements about human suffering, costs of treatment, or the number of people affected by the clinical problem.

– Explain how the author justified the study’s significance, considering factors like human suffering, treatment costs, or the scale of the clinical issue.

22. Identify the purpose of the study. An author may clearly state the purpose of the study or may describe the purpose as the study goals, objectives, or aims.

– Determine the study’s purpose, which might be explicitly stated or described as goals, objectives, or aims.

23. List research questions that the study was designed to answer. If the author does not explicitly provide the questions, attempt to infer the questions from the answers.

– Compile the research questions guiding the study, even if not explicitly outlined by the author.

24. Were the purpose and research questions related to the problem?

– Assess the alignment between the study’s purpose and research questions with the identified problem.

Methods of Study:

25. Identify the benefits and risks of participation addressed by the authors. Were there benefits or risks the authors do not identify?

– Recognize the benefits and risks discussed by the authors regarding participant involvement and assess whether any unaddressed benefits or risks exist.

26. Was informed consent obtained from the subjects or participants?

– Determine if informed consent was obtained from study subjects or participants.

27. Did it seem that the subjects participated voluntarily in the study?

– Assess whether study subjects appeared to participate voluntarily.

28. Was institutional review board approval obtained from the agency in which the study was conducted?

– Confirm if institutional review board approval was secured from the relevant agency.

29. Are the major variables (independent and dependent variables) identified and defined? What were these variables?

– Identify and define the major variables, both independent and dependent, used in the study.

30. How were data collected in this study? What rationale did the author provide for using this data collection method?

– Describe the data collection methods employed in the study and the author’s rationale for selecting these methods.

31. Identify the time period for data collection of the study. Describe the sequence of data collection events for a participant.

– Specify the data collection time frame and outline the sequence of events for participants in data collection.

32. Describe the data management and analysis methods used in the study. Did the author discuss how the rigor of the process was assured? For example, does the author describe maintaining a paper trail of critical decisions that were made during the analysis of the data? Was statistical software used to ensure accuracy of the analysis?

– Explain the data management and analysis methods employed in the study, including any measures taken to ensure rigor and accuracy.

33. What measures were used to minimize the effects of researcher bias (their experiences and perspectives)? For example, did two researchers independently analyze the data and compare their analyses?

– Detail the steps taken to minimize researcher bias, such as independent data analysis and comparison.

Results of Study:

34. What is the researcher’s interpretation of findings?

– Summarize the researcher’s interpretation of the study’s findings.

35. Are the findings valid or an accurate reflection of reality? Do you have confidence in the findings?

– Evaluate the validity of the findings and your confidence in their accuracy.

36. What limitations of the study were identified by researchers?

– Identify the limitations acknowledged by the researchers.

37. Was there a coherent logic to the presentation of findings?

– Assess whether the presentation of findings followed a coherent logic.

38. What implications do the findings have for nursing practice? For example, can the findings of the study be applied to general nursing practice, to a specific population, or to a specific area of nursing?

– Discuss how the findings can be applied in nursing practice, considering general practice, specific populations, or specialized nursing areas.

39. What suggestions are made for further studies?

– Highlight any recommendations or suggestions for future research made by the study.

Ethical Considerations:

40. Was the study approved by an Institutional Review Board?

– Confirm whether the study received approval from an Institutional Review Board.

41. Was patient privacy protected? Were there ethical considerations regarding the treatment or lack of?

– Assess whether patient privacy was safeguarded and identify any ethical considerations related to treatment.

Conclusion:

42. Emphasize the importance and congruity of the thesis statement.

– Highlight the significance and alignment of the thesis statement.

43. Provide a logical wrap-up to bring the appraisal to completion and to leave a lasting impression and take-away points useful in nursing practice.

– Conclude logically, leaving a lasting impression and offering practical take-away points for nursing practice.

44. Incorporate a critical appraisal and a brief analysis of the utility and applicability of the findings to nursing practice.

– Critically appraise the study and briefly analyze how its findings can be applied in nursing practice.

45. Integrate a summary of the knowledge learned in the nursing research critique essay.

– Summarize the key insights gained from the nursing research critique essay.