NURS 6003 Discussion: Using the Walden Library

NURS 6003 Discussion: Using the Walden Library

Discussion – Week 4 Main Post

The peer-reviewed article I selected pertains to the prevention of primary cesarean sections. As a nurse in the Labor and Delivery field, this topic is directly relevant to my practice area. Primary c-section deliveries pose increased risks to patients, including infection, pain, and bleeding (Games, Neerland, & Kennedy, 2019). To address this concern, a hospital initiated a project aimed at reducing primary c-sections through various interventions and collaboration with the American College of Nurse-Midwives. These interventions included increased utilization of birthing and peanut balls, enhanced nurse support, and improved collaboration among healthcare providers (Games, Neerland, & Kennedy, 2019). Over a span of two years, the primary c-section rates among first-time mothers decreased from 29 percent to 25 percent NURS 6003 Discussion: Using the Walden Library.

25 Best Databases for Peer-Reviewed and Scholarly Journal Articles

The database I utilized for my article search is the CINAHL Plus with Full Text. CINAHL stands for the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (Walden University Library, n.d.). I opted for this database due to its extensive coverage of various nursing topics and its inclusion of peer-reviewed articles (Walden University Library, n.d.). The search process for peer-reviewed articles in the CINAHL Plus database was straightforward, involving the use of Boolean operators like “AND” to combine ideas. Under the CINAHL Plus, I conducted a search with the terms “quality improvement” and “labor and delivery,” resulting in 219 relevant pieces after applying the filter for scholarly journals.

The CINAHL Plus with Full Text database proves valuable for nursing students, as it offers a wealth of information on nursing and medical topics, primarily in the form of journals. This resource is particularly beneficial when gathering material for discussion questions. I would recommend this database to colleagues owing to its user-friendly nature and its support for evidence-based practice research. Additionally, the database’s incorporation of Boolean operators like “AND,” “OR,” and “NOT” allows for precise topic narrowing (Walden University Library, n.d.). Being listed among the top 15 databases for nurses further solidifies its credibility and usefulness for research purposes. In summary, this database is dependable, accessible, and likely to earn the approval of colleagues after repeated use.

References

Games, B., Neerland, C., & Kennedy, S. (2019). Reducing Primary Cesareans: An Innovative Multiprolonged Approach to Supporting Physiological Labor and Vaginal Birth. The Journal of Perinatal and Neonatal Nursing, 33(1), 52-60, https://doi.org/10.1097/0000000000000378

Walden University Library. (n.d.). Databases A-Z: Nursing. Retrieved October 4, 2019, from https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/az.php?s=19981

NURS 6003 Discussion: Using the Walden Library Response

First of all, I appreciate your work in Labor and Delivery and your dedication to furthering your education. I enjoyed reading the article you selected to research. As a mother of four children who underwent four c-sections, I understand the importance of your chosen topic related to preventing primary c-sections. My first childbirth was complicated and resulted in an emergency c-section, leading to planned c-sections for subsequent pregnancies. I often wish I had been more informed about vaginal birth after c-section (VBAC) options, as my third c-section resulted in extended hospitalization due to bleeding complications and a blood clot. The increase in c-section rates in the United States has been well-documented by the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (Games, Neerland, & Kennedy, 2019). I was pleasantly surprised to learn that the most recent rates are decreasing NURS 6003 Discussion: Using the Walden Library.

I used the CINAHL Plus database following your instructions, and I found the article with ease, finding it to be highly informative. For my own research article, I utilized MEDLINE and found it to be equally user-friendly and informative. Additionally, I discovered the CINAHL & MEDLINE combined search, which includes “peer-reviewed articles, reports of evidence-based practice, case studies, systematic reviews, and more” (Walden University Library, n.d.). This combined search option might be worth considering for future searches, as it combines the strengths of both databases.

References

Games, B., Neerland, C., & Kennedy, S. (2019). Reducing primary cesareans: An innovative multipronged approach to supporting physiologic labor and vaginal birth. The Journal of Perinatal and Neonatal Nursing, 33(1), 52-60. https://doi.org/10.1097/0000000000000378.

Walden University Library. (n.d.) Databases A-Z: Nursing. Retrieved December 7, 2021 from https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/az.php?s=19981

Discussion: Leveraging the Walden Library

Where can one discover substantiation to illuminate their ideas and scholastic composition? During your academic journey, the integration of scholarly literature will be instrumental in investigating concepts, shaping cognitive pathways, and acquiring fresh perspectives. As you navigate the domain of scholarly literature, it becomes paramount to harness resources hailing from respected, peer-reviewed origins and scholarly publications. It is plausible that you may have already identified online resources and databases that you favor or have found advantageous in the past. In this discourse, we delve into the databases attainable via the Walden Library.

Note: Unless explicitly specified otherwise, initial contributions to discussions are expected by Day 3, and follow-up responses should be submitted by Day 6. Active participation in the discussion over a minimum of three distinct days (one for the original post and one for each response) is mandatory. Compliance with the weekly schedule is crucial to allow ample time for others to respond to your contributions. Moreover, responding promptly to queries directed at your original post is anticipated.

To Prepare:

1. Familiarize yourself with the information provided in the Learning Resources regarding how to utilize the Walden Library, conduct searches in databases, and assess online materials.

2. Commence your quest for a peer-reviewed article that is relevant to your field of practice and captivates your interest.

By the third day of Week 4, submit the following:

In accordance with the appropriate APA formatting guidelines, cite the peer-reviewed article you have chosen that pertains to your area of practice and holds your specific interest. Identify the database you employed to conduct your article search. Elaborate on any challenges you encountered during the process of searching for this article. Assess whether this database would be beneficial to your colleagues and elucidate the rationale behind your assessment. Additionally, provide your reasoning for endorsing or not endorsing this particular database.

By the sixth day of Week 4, respond to at least two of your peers’ contributions by sharing insights or strategies derived from your own experiences in navigating this database, or by suggesting alternative resources that might be helpful.