

In this task, students are tasked with creating a reflective analysis that incorporates their personal nursing philosophy. The Reflective Analysis Case Report Component Paper task allows for the use of first-person language when appropriate for conveying personal viewpoints, while still adhering to the guidelines provided below.
Utilize the following information to ensure the successful completion of the assignment:
Get your assignment on DNP-815A Reflective Analysis Case Report Component Paper done by certified MDs and PhDs in the USA. ORDER NOW!
– Doctoral students must follow the current APA style for their essay assignments. The current APA Style Guide can be found in the Student Success Center.
– A rubric is assigned to this task. Prior to commencing the assignment, it is advisable to review the rubric in order to familiarize yourself with the expectations for successful completion.
– A minimum of three peer-reviewed references, published within the last five years, is obligatory.
– You are obligated to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. If you require assistance, a link to the LopesWrite technical support articles can be found in Class Resources.
Write a reflective analysis comprising 1,000-1,250 words, encompassing your personal nursing philosophy, which should address the following fundamental aspects:
– What is your fundamental belief concerning the individual person?
– How does your personal perspective influence your approach to patients?
– What comprises the environment?
– How do the individual and the environment interact?
– What is your perspective on health?
– How is illness interconnected with health?
– In what ways do you envisage nursing leaders serving others in manners that foster human well-being?
– What is the core rationale behind the existence of nursing?
It may be feasible to accrue portfolio practice immersion hours for this task. Following the References section of your paper, input the following statement:
Practice Immersion Hours Completion Statement DNP-815A
I, (INSERT NAME), confirm that I have fulfilled and documented (NUMBER OF) clock hours in alignment with the objectives and goals of this assignment. Additionally, I have meticulously recorded these practice immersion hours in the Lopes Activity Tracker for validation purposes. I will ensure that all necessary approvals are obtained from my faculty and practice immersion preceptor/mentor prior to the conclusion of the course.
Criterion |
1. Unsatisfactory |
2. Less Than Satisfactory |
3. Satisfactory |
4. Good |
5. Excellent |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Central Reason for the Existence of Nursing Research Central Reason for the Existence of Nursing Research |
0 points No outside sources were used to support the assignment. |
3.84 points Few outside sources were used to support the assignment. Limited research is apparent. |
4.22 points Research is adequate. Sources are standard in relevance, quality of outside sources, or timeliness. |
4.42 points Research is timely and relevant, and addresses all of the issues stated in the assignment criteria. |
4.8 points Research is supportive of the rationale presented. Sources are distinctive and address all of the issues stated in the assignment criteria. |
Research Citations (In-text citations for paraphrasing and direct quotes, and reference page listing and formatting, as appropriate to assignment and style) |
0 points No reference page is included. No citations are used. |
4.48 points Reference page is present. Citations are inconsistently used. |
4.93 points Reference page is included and lists sources used in the paper. Sources are appropriately documented, although some errors may be present. |
5.15 points Reference page is present and fully inclusive of all cited sources. Documentation is appropriate and citation style is usually correct. |
5.6 points In-text citations and a reference page are complete and correct. The documentation of cited sources is free of error. |
Argument Logic and Construction Argument Logic and Construction |
0 points Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. |
3.2 points Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. |
3.52 points Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. |
3.68 points Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. |
4 points Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative. |
Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) |
0 points Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. |
5.12 points Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent. |
5.63 points Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. |
5.89 points Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style. |
6.4 points All format elements are correct. |
How Illness Relates to Health How Illness Relates to Health |
0 points A discussion of how illness relates to health is not present. |
5.12 points A discussion of how illness relates to health is present but insufficient in detail or incomplete. |
5.63 points A discussion of how illness relates to health is present but at a perfunctory level. |
5.89 points A discussion of how illness relates to health is present in full. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources. |
6.4 points A discussion of how illness relates to health is present in full. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Discussion is insightful and forward-thinking. Information presented is from current scholarly sources. |
What Constitutes the Environment What Constitutes the Environment |
0 points A discussion of what constitutes the environment is not present. |
5.12 points A discussion of what constitutes the environment is present but insufficient in detail or incomplete. DNP-815A Reflective Analysis Case Report Component Paper |
5.63 points A discussion of what constitutes the environment is present but at a perfunctory level. |
5.89 points A discussion of what constitutes the environment is present in full. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources. |
6.4 points A discussion of what constitutes the environment is present in full. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Discussion is insightful and forward-thinking. Information presented is from current scholarly sources. |
How Nursing Leaders Might Serve Others How Nursing Leaders Might Serve Others |
0 points How nursing leaders might serve others in ways that promote human flourishing is not discussed. |
5.12 points How nursing leaders might serve others in ways that promote human flourishing is present but insufficient in detail or incomplete. |
5.63 points How nursing leaders might serve others in ways that promote human flourishing is present but at a perfunctory level. |
5.89 points How nursing leaders might serve others in ways that promote human flourishing is present in full. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources. |
6.4 points How nursing leaders might serve others in ways that promote human flourishing is present in full. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Discussion is insightful and forward-thinking. Information presented is from current scholarly sources. |
Thesis Development and Purpose Thesis Development and Purpose |
0 points Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. |
3.2 points Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear. |
3.52 points Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose. |
3.68 points Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. |
4 points Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive. The essence of the paper is contained within the thesis. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear. |
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) DNP-815A Reflective Analysis Case Report Component Paper |
0 points Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used. |
3.2 points Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, and/or word choice are present. |
3.52 points Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used. |
3.68 points Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used. |
4 points Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. |
View of What Constitutes Health View of What Constitutes Health |
0 points A discussion of the view of the learner on what constitutes health is not present. |
5.12 points A discussion of the view of the learner on what constitutes health is present but insufficient in detail or incomplete. |
5.63 points A discussion of the view of the learner on what constitutes health is present but at a perfunctory level. |
5.89 points A discussion of the view of the learner on what constitutes health is convincing and defines specific elements. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources. |
6.4 points A discussion of the view of the learner on what constitutes health is convincing and defines specific elements. Discussion is insightful and forward-thinking. Information presented is from current scholarly sources. |
Discussion of How Personal Worldview Influences Approach to Patients Discussion of How Personal Worldview Influences Approach to Patients |
0 points A discussion of how personal worldview influences approach to patients is not present. |
5.12 points A discussion of how personal worldview influences approach to patients is present but insufficient in detail or incomplete. |
5.63 points A discussion of how personal worldview influences approach to patients is present but at a perfunctory level. |
5.89 points A discussion of how personal worldview influences approach to patients is present in full. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Discussion is insightful and forward-thinking. Information presented is from current scholarly sources. |
6.4 points A discussion of how personal worldview influences approach to patients is present in full. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources. |
Discussion of Central Belief About the Individual Person Discussion of Central Belief About the Individual Person |
0 points A discussion of central belief about the individual person is not present. |
5.12 points A discussion of central belief about the individual person is present but insufficient in detail or incomplete. ORDER YOUR PAPER NOW |
5.63 points A discussion of central belief about the individual person is present but at a perfunctory level. |
5.89 points A discussion of central belief about the individual person is present in full. Discussion is convincing. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources. |
6.4 points A discussion of central belief about the individual person is present in full. Discussion is insightful and forward-thinking. Information presented is from current scholarly sources. |
Central Reason for the Existence of Nursing Central Reason for the Existence of Nursing |
0 points A discussion of the central reason for the existence of nursing is not present. |
5.12 points A discussion of the central reason for the existence of nursing is present but insufficient in detail or incomplete. |
5.63 points A discussion of the central reason for the existence of nursing is present but at a perfunctory level. |
5.89 points A discussion of the central reason for the existence of nursing is present in full. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources. |
6.4 points A discussion of the central reason for the existence of nursing is present in full. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Discussion is insightful and forward-thinking. Information presented is from current scholarly sources. |
How the Individual Person and the Environment Interact How the Individual Person and the Environment Interact |
0 points A discussion of how the individual person and the environment interact is not present. |
5.12 points A discussion of how the individual person and the environment interact is present but insufficient in detail or incomplete. DNP-815A Reflective Analysis Case Report Component Paper |
5.63 points A discussion of how the individual person and the environment interact is present but at a perfunctory level. |
5.89 points A discussion of how the individual person and the environment interact is present, convincing, and thorough. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources. |
6.4 points A discussion of how the individual person and the environment interact is present, convincing, and thorough. Discussion is insightful and forward-thinking. Information presented is from current scholarly sources. ![]() Dont wait until the last minute.Provide your requirements and let our native nursing writers deliver your assignments ASAP. |
You cannot copy content of this page