Applications of Philosophical Underpinnings

Applications of Philosophical Underpinnings

Do you ever wonder why it’s important to understand the theories and philosophies that form the basis of behavior analysis? This week’s learning materials by Fryling (2013) explore how behavior analytic theory and philosophy are essential in applied behavior analysis. Fryling emphasizes that behavior analysis stands out due to its natural science perspective and comprehensive, integrated components.

The natural science perspective of behavior analysis requires that its concepts are based on observable, socially significant events, rather than relying on hypothetical constructs found in traditional psychology and other helping professions. This perspective emphasizes real-world, tangible aspects of behavior.

The idea of comprehensive, integrated components in behavior analysis refers to the interdependence between behavior analytic theory, philosophy, experimental analysis of behavior (EAB), applied behavior analysis (ABA), and the delivery of behavioral services. These components work together to form a cohesive approach to understanding and influencing behavior.

The emphasis on a systematic, natural science approach and the integration of these components distinguishes behavior analysis and provides a solid foundation for behavior analytic interventions. Since behavior analysts often collaborate with professionals who might rely on hypothetical constructs, understanding the theory and philosophy of behavior analysis becomes crucial to effectively communicate and apply these principles in practice.

In the book “Radical Behaviorism for ABA Practitioners” by James M. Johnston, the importance of understanding the philosophical underpinnings of behavior analysis is further highlighted:

1. ABA practitioners operate at the intersection of science and society, bridging the gap between scientific and everyday understandings of behavior.

2. Many people’s beliefs about how behavior works contradict established scientific findings, so practitioners need to bridge this gap for their clients.

3. Practitioners must be capable of persuading clients and other professionals to support objectives and procedures that are proven to be effective through ABA literature.

4. Understanding radical behaviorism ensures consistency between the science of behavior and the technology used in ABA interventions.

5. It helps avoid conceptual backsliding encouraged by everyday language, ensuring that interventions remain based on sound scientific principles.

NURS 6050 Week 2 Assignment Assignment: Agenda Comparison Grid and Fact Sheet or Talking Points Brief

In this discussion, you will select an article from the behavior analytic literature published from 2012 onwards that describes an intervention addressing a practical concern. For the chosen article, you will evaluate how each of the philosophical underpinnings of behavior analysis – selectionism, determinism, empiricism, parsimony, and pragmatism – are represented.

Reference:
Graff, R. B. (2014). A review of “Radical Behaviorism for ABA Practitioners” by James M. Johnston [Review of the book Radical behaviorism for ABA practitioners, by J. M. Johnston]. APBA Reporter, 50, 1–3.

To Prepare:

1. Review this week’s learning resources to gain an understanding of the philosophical underpinnings of applied behavior analysis: selectionism, determinism, empiricism, parsimony, and pragmatism.

2. Identify an article from the behavior analytic literature published from 2012 onwards that describes an intervention aimed at addressing a practical concern.

3. Review the interactive media in the Learning Resources, “Philosophical Underpinnings of Behavior Analysis.”

By Day 4 of Week 6

Share the title of the article you’ve selected and provide a brief summary of its content. Then, assess how each philosophical underpinning of behavior analysis – selectionism, determinism, empiricism, parsimony, and pragmatism – is demonstrated in the article. Make sure to include a reference and a link to the selected article, following APA format and style.

Read your colleagues’ contributions.

Please note that for this discussion, you are required to complete your initial post before you can view and respond to your colleagues’ posts. To begin, click on the “To Participate in this Discussion” link, then select “Create Thread” to complete your initial post. Keep in mind that after you click “Submit,” you won’t be able to edit or delete your posts, and anonymous posting isn’t allowed. Please review your post carefully before clicking “Submit.”

By Day 6 of Week 6

Respond to at least two colleagues’ posts by expanding on their explanations of how the selected article either represents or fails to represent each of the philosophical underpinnings of behavior analysis. Provide examples to support your responses.

Make sure to back your posts and responses with specific references to behavior-analytic theory and research. In addition to the Learning Resources, search the Walden Library and the internet for peer-reviewed articles to support your posts and responses. Use proper APA format and citations, including those in the Learning Resources. Return to this discussion in a few days to read the responses to your initial post and consider what you’ve learned from your colleagues’ comments.